> I refuse to accept that the only good response to an imperfect technology is to abandon it. We need more specific criticisms than the ever-present feeling that „’something’s not right.“ What thing? Developing a political agenda to remake, improve, or forbid technologies requires some sort of rubric: how can I judge what I’m using? What are the deleterious impacts? How are they specific to these media and this time? Which effects are *caused by* the technologies and which are *enabled by* the technologies and which just happen to *occur through* the technologies? What are the ethics? What are the mechanics? What is the baseline?
–Alexis Madrigal, [‚Camp Grounded,‘ ‚Digital Detox,‘ and the Age of Techno-Anxiety](http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/07/the-new-new-naturalism-in-the-era-of-processed-relationships/277600/)
Einer der prägensten Absätze für mich in den letzten Monaten.
Schreibe einen Kommentar